Assessment criteria and rating scale of e-learning lesson for preschool children

 TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC 
TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM TP HỒ CHÍ MINH 
Tập 17, Số 5 (2020): 913-919 
HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION 
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 
Vol. 17, No. 5 (2020): 913-919 
ISSN: 
1859-3100 Website:  
913 
Research Article* 
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND RATING SCALE 
OF E-LEARNING LESSON FOR PRESCHOOL CHILDREN 
Tran Thi Tam Minh 
Saigon University, Vietnam 
Corresponding author: Tran Thi Minh Tam – Email: tamminhtran.gdmn@gmail.com 
Received: April 06, 2020; Revised: April 21, 2020; Accepted: May 28, 2020 
ABSTRACT 
In Vietnam, E-Learning lessons have been implemented in preschools since 2009. However, 
until now, there have not been any set of assessment criteria and the rating scale for this activity. 
The development of assessment criteria and rating scale for e-Learning lessons is critical to help 
preschool teachers to design of e-Learning lesson more effectively. At the same time, it makes the 
assessment of e-Learning lessons more accurate and scientific. By analyzing and synthesizing 
relating documents and the papers of local and foreign authors, combined with comparing and 
analyzing the application of information technology in teaching activities in Vietnam in reality, this 
article systemizes the general requirements for e-Learning lessons for preschool children, the 
selection criteria for teaching contents and for subjects and electronic databases. Based on these, 
the author proposes an rating scale with 17 criteria for an e-Learning lesson. 
Keywords: e-Learning lesson; preschool; preschool children; criteria; evaluation scale 
1. Introduction 
The application of e-Learning lesson in preschools has been implemented since 
2009. However, until now, this activity of preschool teachers still has certain limitations 
such as selecting topics that are inappropriate for teaching with information technology, 
activities without sound and images, lack of interactions, leading to passivity or boredom 
of children. Movies and photos used still have many technical and aesthetic errors, not yet 
linked to technical factors and pedagogy. 
In addition, the evaluation of an e-Learning lesson at schools is conducted mainly 
based on personal experience, which does not help teachers much to design lessons. At the 
same time, it does not guarantee the rationales and the reasons of evaluation. 
Therefore, developing the criteria for designing and assessing e-Learning lessons to 
help preschool teachers to design e-Learning lessons more effectively and to evaluate e-
Learning lesson more scientifically and appropriately is necessary. Through research, 
Cite this article as: Tran Thi Tam Minh (2020). Assessment criteria and rating scale of e-Learning lesson for 
preschool children. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 17(5), 913-919. 
HCMUE Journal of Science Vol. 17, No. 5 (2020): 913-919 
914 
analysis and synthesis of relevant materials, this paper presents the general requirements of 
an e-Learning lesson, criteria for selecting topics and electronic databases, from which the 
contents and rating of electronic lessons are proposed. 
2. Content 
2.1. Concept 
Currently, the terms “E-learning lesson”, “electronic lesson plan”, “electronic 
lecture” or “electronic lesson” are still controversial, However, basically these terms all 
refer to a form of teaching that incorporates technology, meaning that the lesson is 
conducted by a means of technology such as computers, projectors or other electronic 
devices. The article chooses to use the term “E-Learning lesson” because firstly, teaching 
activities for children in preschool are understood in a broad sense, preschool teachers only 
conduct teaching activities in a broad sense, not like teaching e at other levels (Nguyen, 
1998). Secondly, the educational activities of the lesson are carried out through electronic 
devices such as computers and projectors or interactive boards. Therefore, using the term 
“E-Learning lesson” is more appropriate than “electronic lectures”. 
The term “electronic lesson plan” is not appropriate when describing the teaching 
time in the classroom with electronic tools and devices because “lesson plan is a plan, 
lesson plan designed to conduct classroom teaching” (Bui, 2013). Therefore, the term 
“electronic lesson plan” is understood as planning, and lesson plans presented by 
technology means and stored in computer files will be more accurate. 
2.2. Some general requirements on e-Learning lessons for preschool children 
E-Learning lessons are very suitable when teaching children to get acquainted with 
their surroundings, language development, literary works, music education, value 
education and life skills and some of the contents in the form of math symbols. This is 
because they provides vivid images and sound, saves the cost of learning materials and can 
be reused many times without taking up much storage space and efforts. However, for the 
remaining activities such as shaping, physical activity, preschool teachers should consider 
if they want to use e-Learning lessons or not because the characteristics of these activities 
are more in the form of practice. Normally, adopting an electronic lesson in the shaping 
activities will be suitable for the purpose of providing the symbol and the work’s origin or 
instructing the child how to make certain products. For e-Learning lessons used in physical 
activities, it is usually a simulation game, a movement with a combination of music or 
learning games. In addition, according to the above orientations, when designing an e-
Learning lesson, the following should be noted: 
- The structure of e-Learning lesson basically does not differ from the traditional 
lessons, but the number of activities and the systematic nature of the activities depend on 
the educational objectives and contents. 
HCMUE Journal of Science Tran Thi Tam Minh 
915 
- It is advisable to limit the time that children are exposed to computer screens. For 3-
year-old children, it should not exceed 15 minutes, and for children from 4-6 years of age, 
the maximum access time is 40-60 minutes a day; children under 3 years of age should not 
access technology (Van Scoter, Ellis, & Railsback, 2001). In one week, e-Learning lessons 
should only be used once or twice (Dao, 2010). 
- All activities in e-Learning lessons have the rate of activities with application of 
information technology is 2/3 (if the rate is less then 2/3, the lessons are considered as 
using information technology, not e-Learning lessons). 
- Activities in the lesson must be intertwined between static and dynamic; creating 
interactions between the children and the media; giving priority to learning games because 
children learn through play. 
- The effects of the software used should have a purpose, to avoid overusing effects 
and images that make the children lose attention. 
- E-Learning lessons need to effectively maximize the strengths of sound and image to 
help the children form and enhance their senses and emotions (delight, surprise, humor, 
curiosity...) 
- Priority should be given to designing activities that have a comprehensive impact on 
children's developmental aspects like a motion game combined with audio - visual on the 
screen and thinking to solve the problem to minimize the risk of lack of movement, social 
interaction when children are exposed to computers. 
- When organizing activities with e-Learning lessons, it is necessary to arrange the 
child's seat physically suitable with enough lighting to ensure the physical development of 
the child. 
2.3. Evaluation criteria and rating scale of e-Learning lessons 
2.3.1. Content selection criteria 
The selection of contents for e-Learning lessons should ensure educational, non-
violent and not having unsuitable factors for children's psychological development. 
Besides, e-Learning lesson is only effective for the contents that have many limitations and 
unsafe for children or costly when applying traditional methods. The details are as follows: 
- There are lots of limitations in terms of geography, space and time to the training 
contents: the cycle of rain, the transformation of things, the life cycle of trees, the life cycle 
of frogs, prehistoric times, dinosaurs, the underground world, the undersea world, deserts, 
clouds, galaxies, countries around the world, Vietnam, tourism, strange flowers, special 
plants (walking trees), wonders of the world... 
- The contents that are not safe for children if learning in the traditional way: 
volcanoes, thunder, natural disasters, peace, earthquakes, floods, dangerous situations in 
accident prevention and inflation prevention education use... 
HCMUE Journal of Science Vol. 17, No. 5 (2020): 913-919 
916 
- The experiments require a lot of time and tools but are difficult to observe such as 
the absorption of roots and stems; waste decomposition; mold development process; what 
does the tree need to live... 
- The contents that is costly if teaching traditionally: National flags of countries 
around the world, National costumes of countries around the world, groups of nutrients in 
food, transportations, seasonal fashion... 
2.3.2. Selection criteria for films and images in designing e-Learning lessons 
- The selection of films and images should be science-based such as providing 
accurate and logical information (except for creative and mythical contents); just long 
enough for the child's ability to concentrate, (about 30-40 seconds); contents in movies or 
pictures should focus on the main contents, avoid the unnecessities that can distract the 
children’s attention. 
- The selection of films and images must ensure aesthetics and education: beautiful, 
attractive to children, sympathetic, non-violent or offensive. 
- Technical aspects: remove background of images if not suitable or unsightly. Images 
should be neat without non-aliased cut lines (unless intended), bright enough. 
- Copyright: most images, movies and audios are downloaded from internet resources, 
so it is important to pay attention to the copyright of the database. For images and videos 
with a copyright mark on them, quote the source. 
2.3.3. Evaluation criteria and the rating scale of e-Learning lessons 
From the above sections, contents and criteria for evaluating e-Learning lessons are 
specified in Table 1 on a 100-point scale: 
Table 1. Evaluation criteria of e-Learning lessons 
No. Evaluation criteria (0 - 50 point) 
Level 1 
(1p) 
Level 2 
(2p) 
Level 3 
(3p) 
Level 
4 (4p) 
Level 
5 (5p) 
1 
Objectives are suitable for age and 
training program 
2 
Objectives are suitable for deploying 
electronic lesson 
3 
Educational contents suit the 
objectives, topics, and age 
4 
Educational contents suitable for 
implementing e-Learning lessons 
5 
Activities appropriate to age group 
and goals of the lesson 
6 
The activities of the lesson are 
balanced and logical 
7 
Activities suitable for information 
technology (double the point) 
8 
The methods of organization of 
activities are suitable (double the 
point) 
HCMUE Journal of Science Tran Thi Tam Minh 
917 
No. Designing (0 – 40 point) 
1 
Beautiful pictures, clear, not 
copyrighted 
2 
Clear movie, condensed film contents, 
suitable length (30 - 60 seconds) 
3 
Sound: loud enough to hear and in 
good quality 
4 
Use effects with clear purpose, not 
overused 
5 
The effect is consistent with the idea 
to be expressed 
6 
Level of information technology 
application (multiply by 2) 
7 Emotional factors 
No. Overall (0 – 10 point) 
1 Time strictly according to regulations 
2 Creativity (ideas, design techniques) 
In particular, level 1 - corresponds to the following indicators: 
- The lesson is designed by basic operations: entering text, inserting images, 
unscientific format, lack of aesthetics. 
- Children's activities are mainly listening to teacher’s explanation and looking at the 
screen. 
- Inappropriate topic (not effective). 
Level 2 - corresponds to the following indicators: 
- Use some basic effects (turn pages, appear, disappear). 
- Basic format, relatively scientific. 
- Sometimes slightly overused effects, causing distraction 
- Inappropriate topics (can be conducted but using other forms will be more effective). 
Level 3 - corresponds to the following indicators: 
- The illustrated contents (images, sounds, movies...) are not suitable (technical 
quality, scientific features...). 
- Use available e-Learning lesson and make some adjustments. 
- Appropriate teaching topics. 
 Level 4 - corresponds to the following indicators: 
- A combination of audio & visual activities. 
- Smoothly use the effects to create vivid products: animation, games... 
- Good and consistent image - sound - movie quality. 
- Suitable and new topics. 
HCMUE Journal of Science Vol. 17, No. 5 (2020): 913-919 
918 
Level 5 - corresponds to the following indicators: 
- The activities of children combine harmoniously, scientifically and naturally with the 
contents of e-Learning lesson. 
- Combining different/various effects to create a new, suitable and attractive effect. 
- Combined use of many supporting softwares to make e-Learning lessons more vivid 
and attractive. 
*Note: Because this is an electronic lesson, elements suitable to information 
technology in terms of application level and form of activity have double points compared 
to other criteria. 
3. Conclusion 
The use of traditional or modern teaching facilities needs to meet certain 
requirements and principles to ensure the quality of education because they are only 
considered as tools and the effectiveness depends entirely on the implementation. 
Therefore, to promote the advantages of information technology in teaching such as vivid 
visualization, high simulation ability, not limited by time - space...; limitations such as 
obesity, delayed speech or language, lack of physical activity when children access too 
often to computers, lack of evidence and research when designing e-Learning lessons, 
preschool teachers should comply with the requirements and the criteria described in this 
paper. In addition, the evaluation of e-Learning lessons should also be based on the 
proposed evaluation contents and criteria to ensure that it is science-based and 
synchronized. 
 Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest to declare. 
REFERENCES 
Bui, H. (2013). Tu dien Giao duc hoc [Education Dictionary]. Hanoi: Dictionary Encyclopedia 
Publisher. 
Dao, T. L. (2007). Ung dung cong nghe thong tin trong day hoc o truong pho thong Viet Nam 
[Application of information technology in teaching in Vietnamese high schools]. Hanoi: 
Vietnam Academy of Science Research and Education. 
Nguyen, A. T. (1998). Giao duc hoc mam non [Preschool Education]. Hanoi: Publisher of 
Education University. 
Van Scoter, J., Ellis, D., & Railsback, J. (2001). Technology in Early Childhood Education: 
Finding the Balance. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. 
HCMUE Journal of Science Tran Thi Tam Minh 
919 
TIÊU CHÍ VÀ THANG ĐÁNH GIÁ BÀI DẠY ĐIỆN TỬ CHO TRẺ MẦM NON 
Trần Thị Tâm Minh 
Trường Đại học Sài Gòn, Việt Nam 
Tác giả liên hệ: Trần Thị Tâm Minh – Email: tamminhtran.gdmn@gmail.com 
Ngày nhận bài: 06-4-2020; ngày nhận bài sửa: 21-4-2020, ngày chấp nhận đăng: 28-5-2020 
TÓM TẮT 
Bài dạy điện tử đã được triển khai trong trường mầm non từ năm 2009, nhưng cho đến nay 
vẫn chưa có tiêu chí và thang đánh giá rõ ràng, khoa học cho hoạt động này. Việc xây dựng tiêu 
chí và thang đánh giá bài dạy điện tử là cần thiết vì giúp giáo viên mầm non định hướng thiết kế 
bài dạy điện tử hiệu quả hơn đồng thời giúp việc đánh giá bài dạy điện tử khoa học, phù hợp hơn. 
Bằng phương pháp phân tích tổng hợp tài liệu có liên quan của các tác giả trong và ngoài nước, 
kết hợp với việc so sánh và phân tích thực tế ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin trong tổ chức hoạt 
động giáo dục tại Việt Nam, bài báo đã hệ thống hóa những yêu cầu chung của bài dạy điện tử cho 
trẻ mầm non, tiêu chí lựa chọn nội dung, tiêu chí lựa chọn đề tài và cơ sở dữ liệu điện tử. Trên cơ 
sở đó, tác giả đề xuất thang đánh giá bài dạy điện tử cho trẻ mầm non theo 5 mức độ với 17 tiêu 
chí cụ thể. 
Từ khóa: bài dạy điện tử; mầm non; trẻ mầm non; tiêu chí; thang đánh giá